$5 Billion School Voucher Proposal Encounters Senate Hurdles amidst Tax Reform Debate

On May 22, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," a monumental tax and spending package central to President Donald Trump's legislative agenda. The 215-214 vote underscored the deep divisions within Congress, and the bill now proceeds to the Senate for deliberation.

This legislation aims to solidify the tax cuts initiated during Trump's first term and introduces new reductions, notably the removal of taxes on tips and overtime pay. Additionally, it proposes sweeping changes to social programs by enforcing stricter work prerequisites for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while also discontinuing certain clean energy tax incentives. The bill further allocates significant funding towards border security and defense expenditures.

Mechanics of the Proposed Voucher System

The proposal introduces a $5 billion yearly program through the federal tax code to incentivize donations to Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). Contributors to these SGOs would benefit from a dollar-for-dollar federal tax credit, establishing this incentive as more lucrative than traditional charitable tax deductions. According to NPR, the SGOs would distribute funds as scholarships for educational expenses, including private school tuition, textbooks, and homeschooling resources.

Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a staunch advocate of the bill, commented, "Facilitating parental choice in education is fundamental to realizing the American Dream."

Debate Surrounding Support and Opposition

Proponents argue that the measure grants families, particularly those in underperforming school districts, greater educational choice, propagating the notion of "education freedom" while endowing parents with more autonomy over their children's learning environment.

Conversely, critics raise alarms that the proposal might drain resources from public education systems while predominantly benefiting affluent donors through tax loopholes. Sasha Pudelski of the AASA, the School Superintendents Association, cautioned that the plan "could exacerbate issues already present in voucher systems nationwide, such as significant waste, fraud, and abuse."

Critics also highlight the potential for extensive tax avoidance. Contributors could donate appreciated stocks to SGOs, sidestepping capital gains taxes while still obtaining the full tax credit—offering substantial tax advantages to wealthier individuals.

Consequences for Public Education

Advocates of public education, like the Campaign for Children, argue that the plan could destabilize public schooling by channeling funds to private establishments, potentially deepening educational inequities and diminishing educational quality for the majority who depend on public institutions. The OSBA report underlines that "focusing instead on solutions that benefit the 90% of U.S. students in public schools is imperative."

Currently under Senate consideration, this proposal's fate remains uncertain despite its potential passage through budget reconciliation—a process that allows for enactment with a simple majority and without bipartisan backing. Democratic opposition and resistance from educational advocacy groups continue to loom large.

The ongoing discourse could significantly impact the American educational framework, redefining funding distribution and accessibility across the nation.

Share this article...

Facebook

Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Let us take your tax and small business needs off your hands today.