Key Insights on Michigan's Cannabis Tax Legal Battle

Michigan has found itself at the forefront of a pivotal legal battle concerning cannabis taxation, as a new 24% wholesale marijuana tax is being challenged for its constitutional validity. This court case is attracting widespread attention due to its potential implications on cannabis pricing and broader tax policy in the U.S. — pivotal factors for both cannabis consumers and tax policy analysts nationwide.

Image 1

This matter isn't confined to Michigan alone. Whether you’re directly involved in the cannabis industry or situated far away, the results of this case could influence how states balance legal frameworks and taxation in this evolving marketplace.

Details of Michigan’s Proposal

As integral to its fiscal strategy for 2025-2026, Michigan legislators have introduced a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at financing road enhancements. This levy would impact the supply chain before cannabis reaches retail outlets, complementing the existing taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis purchases, sanctioned by voters in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax. If implemented, Michigan’s tax structure would become one of the most intricate in the U.S. cannabis market.

Legal Objections from the Industry

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) fiercely argues that this tax is unconstitutional. Their contention revolves around the premise that:

The 2018 voter-endorsed marijuana legislation cannot be modified without a supermajority approval.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), safeguarded by voter mandate, mandates a three-fourths supermajority for any amendments. However, lawmakers endorsed the new tax with a mere simple majority, prompting MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol to stress their commitment:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Image 2

Industry proponents caution that the tax hike could escalate costs, pressure small enterprises, and potentially redirect consumers to unregulated markets—similar to patterns observed in high-tax states like California.

State’s Defence

The state’s legal team argues that the tax mandate is permissible because:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct, not altering the 2018 voter-sanctioned cannabis legislation

  • The legislature retains the right to impose taxes for fiscal requisites

  • The tax's objective is to fund transport infrastructure rather than adjust marijuana regulations

Should the judiciary favor the state’s reasoning, the tax will likely be effective from January 1, 2026.

Impact on Consumers and Businesses

While residing outside of Michigan, Americans should still take note, as adaptations in cannabis tax policies tend to influence nationwide trends. If the tax prevails:

  • Wholesale prices could ramp up

  • Retail costs might surge as a result

  • There might be a consumer shift back to economical illicit sources

  • Small-scale businesses might endure financial strain or amalgamation

A vetoed tax would preserve Michigan’s current, less burdensome fiscal structure.

Image 3

Wider National Consequences

The proceedings in Michigan have ramifications that surpass its jurisdictional boundaries.

1. Test of Direct Democracy Measures

Lawmakers bypassing supermajority thresholds could redefine direct democracy processes in various states.

2. Affects State Cannabis Fiscal Models

Infrastructure-challenged states might emulate Michigan’s template if the tax withstands its legal test.

3. Illuminating the Diversity in Cannabis Taxation

While states like Oregon and Michigan advocate moderate cannabis taxes, others like California struggle with prohibitive levies and vibrant illegal markets.

Michigan’s case might become a reference for addressing similar tax disputes elsewhere.

Anticipated Developments

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has completed preliminary hearings and is set to deliver a ruling imminently. The outcome might ultimately require a Michigan Supreme Court evaluation.

No matter the verdict, this decision will prove consequential, not only for Michigan’s cannabis sector but for national dialogues on voter-initiated legislations, nascent industries, and taxation prerogatives.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
Let us take your tax and small business needs off your hands today.